PHOENIX (AP) — The federal government issued a scathing report Thursday that outlines how Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's office has committed a wide range of civil rights violations against Latinos, including a pattern of racial profiling and discrimination and carrying out heavy-handed immigration patrols based on racially charged citizen complaints.
The report, obtained by The Associated Press ahead of its release, is a result of the U.S. Justice Department's
three-year investigation of Arpaio's office amid complaints of racial
profiling and a culture of bias at the agency's top level.
The Justice Department's
conclusions in the civil probe mark the federal government's harshest
rebuke of a national political fixture who has risen to prominence for
his immigration crackdowns and became coveted endorsement among
candidates in the GOP presidential field.
Apart
from the civil rights probe, a federal grand jury also has been
investigating Arpaio's office on criminal abuse-of-power allegations
since at least December 2009 and is specifically examining the
investigative work of the sheriff's anti-public corruption squad.
The civil rights report said federal authorities
will continue to investigate complaints of deputies using excessive
force against Latinos, whether the sheriff's office failed to provide
adequately police services in Hispanic communities and a large number of
sex-crimes cases that were assigned to the agency but weren't followed
up on or investigated at all.
The
report took the sheriff's office to task for launching immigration
patrols, known as "sweeps," based on complaints that Latinos were merely
gathering near a business without committing crimes. Federal
authorities single out Arpaio himself and said his office, known as MCSO, has no clear policies to guard against the violations, even after he changed some of his top aides earlier this year.
"Arpaio's
own actions have helped nurture MCSO's culture of bias," wrote Thomas
Perez, who heads the Justice Department's civil rights division, adding
that the sheriff frequently gave such racially charged letters to some
of his top aides and saved them in his own files.
"MCSO is broken in a number of critical respects. The problems are deeply rooted in MCSO's culture," he said Thursday.
The
Justice Department's expert on measuring racial profiling said it's the
most egregious case of racial profiling in the nation that he has seen
or reviewed in professional literature, Perez said.
Investigators
interviewed more than 400 people, including Arpaio, reviewed thousands
of documents and toured county jails as part of its probe, he said.
If
the sheriff's office doesn't turn around its policies and practices,
the federal government could pull millions of dollars of federal
funding.
Arpaio's office did not immediately respond to AP requests for comment.
The
report will require Arpaio to set up effective policies against
discrimination, improve training and make other changes that would be
monitored for compliance by a judge. Arpaio faces a Jan. 4 deadline for
saying whether he wants to work out an agreement. If not, the federal
government will sue him and let a judge decide the complaint.
Arpaio,
the self-proclaimed toughest sheriff in America, has long denied the
racial profiling allegation, saying people are stopped if deputies have
probable cause to believe they have committed crimes and that deputies
later find many of them are illegal immigrants.
Arpaio
has built his reputation on jailing inmates in tents and dressing them
in pink underwear, selling himself to voters as unceasingly tough on
crime and pushing the bounds of how far local police can go to confront
illegal immigration.
The report
also said he and some top staffers tried to silence people who have
spoken out against the sheriff's office by arresting people without
cause, filing meritless lawsuits against opponents and starting
investigations of critics.
One
example cited by the Justice Department is former top Arpaio aide David
Hendershott, who filed bar complaints against attorneys critical of the
agency along with bringing judicial complaints against judges who were
at odds with the sheriff. All complaints were dismissed.
The
anti-corruption squad's cases against two county officials and a judge
collapsed in court before going to trial and have been criticized by
politicians at odds with the sheriff as trumped up. Arpaio has defended
the investigations as a valid attempt at rooting out corruption in
county government.
The civil
rights report said Latinos are four to nine times more likely to be
stopped in traffic stops in Maricopa County than non-Latinos and that
the agency's immigration policies treat Latinos as if they are all in
the country illegally. Deputies on the immigrant-smuggling squad stop
and arrest Latino drivers without good cause, the investigation found.
A
review done as part of the investigation found that 20 percent of
traffic reports handled by Arpaio's immigrant-smuggling squad from March
2006 to March 2009 were stops — almost all involving Latino drivers —
that were done without reasonable suspicion. The squad's stops rarely
led to smuggling arrests.
Deputies
are encouraged to make high-volume traffic stops in targeted locations.
There were Latinos who were in the U.S. legally who were arrested or
detained without cause during the sweeps, according to the report.
During
the sweeps, deputies flood an area of a city — in some cases, heavily
Latino areas — over several days to seek out traffic violators and
arrest other offenders. Illegal immigrants accounted for 57 percent of
the 1,500 people arrested in the 20 sweeps conducted by his office since
January 2008, according to figures provided by Arpaio's office.
Police
supervisors, including at least one smuggling-squad supervisor, often
used county accounts to send emails that demeaned Latinos to fellow
sheriff's managers, deputies and volunteers in the sheriff's posse. One
such email had a photo of a mock driver's license for a fictional state
called "Mexifornia."
The report
said that the sheriff's office launched an immigration operation two
weeks after the sheriff received a letter in August 2009 letter about a
person's dismay over employees of a McDonald's in the Phoenix suburb of
Sun City who didn't speak English. The tip laid out no criminal
allegations. The sheriff wrote back to thank the writer "for the info,"
said he would look into it and forwarded it to a top aide with a note of
"for our operation."
Federal investigators focused heavily on the language barriers in Arpaio's jails.
Latino
inmates with limited English skills were punished for failing to
understand commands in English by being put in solitary confinement for
up to 23 hours a day or keeping prisoners locked down in their jail pods
for as long as 72 hours without a trip to the canteen area or making
nonlegal phone calls.
The report said some jail officers used racial slurs for Latinos when talking among themselves and speaking to inmates.
Detention
officers refused to accept forms requesting basic daily services and
reporting mistreatment when the documents were completed in Spanish and
pressured Latinos with limited English skills to sign forms that
implicate their legal rights without language assistance.
The
agency pressures Latinos with limited English skills to sign forms by
yelling at them and keeping them in uncomfortably cold cells for long
periods of time.
The Justice
Department said it hadn't yet established a pattern of alleged
wrongdoing by the sheriff's office in the three areas where they will
continue to investigation: complaints of excessive force against
Latinos, botched sex-crimes cases and immigration efforts that have hurt
the agency's trust with the Hispanic community.
Federal
authorities will continue to investigate whether the sheriff's office
has limited the willingness of witnesses and victims to report crimes or
talk to Arpaio's office.
"MCSO has done almost nothing to build such a relationship with Mariciopa County's Latino residents," Perez wrote.
No comments:
Post a Comment